Metrics

For the purposes of the database, tools are assessed qualitatively against the below criteria. These criteria are preliminary and subject to evolution. Their design is based on the range ‘actually-existing’ tools, across both norms and outliers, in order to pragmatically assess their contribution.

Resources are not evaluated in this way, though many touch upon the questions raised.

Transparency
→ The degree to which the construction and function of the tool is visible and auditable.
→ How easily audited is the tool?
→ Is the code OS?

Creative Malleability
→ the range within which the output of the tools can vary.
→ i.e. does it produce similar results most of the time?

Technical Interoperability
→ How technically modifiable is the tool?
→ Can the tool be interfaced with others?

Calibre of research
→ How research-driven is the tool?
→ Are their accompanying materials which situate or explain design decision, testing, and background?
→ What is the tendency for publishing to their community?

Propensity to redistribute
→ How much value does it transfer from private to the public?
→ Conversely, how much value does the tool, and its adoption, tranfer value from public resources to privately governed infrastructure? ➫ How much does it grow existing public value?